ArticleBMC public health2026
Psychometric testing of the teacher food and nutrition-related health and wellbeing questionnaire.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent evaluation of teacher wellbeing rarely includes assessment of diet quality or influential food and nutrition (FN) constructs. Diet quality, and FN constructs such as food skills, are increasingly recognised across health research for their associations with mental health, stress regulation, and overall wellbeing, making their inclusion essential in future iterations of teacher wellbeing assessment.
methodThis study evaluates the reliability and construct validity of the teacher food and nutrition-related health wellbeing questionnaire (TFNQ) created using the online survey platform QuestionPro to measure FN constructs alongside teacher wellbeing outcomes. An intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) ≥ 0.50 was used to establish test-retest reliability, using matched sample data with ≤ 17 days between responses, from both timepoints (dataset one and two, n = 99). Construct validity was assessed with data set one (timepoint 1, n = 438) using confirmatory factor analysis with global fit criteria (root mean square error of approximation ≤ 0.08, comparative fit index ≥ 0.90 and standardised root mean residual ≤ 0.05).
resultsFive hundred and twenty-two primary and secondary schoolteachers from across Australia completed the TFNQ at two timepoints. Six of the seven TFNQ sub-scales achieved an ICC ≥ 0.70; the remaining sub-scale, eating social norms at school achieved an ICC of 0.46. All sub-scales except social support, met at least two of the three global fit criteria for construct validity.
conclusionsThe TFNQ is the first purpose-built evaluation tool to incorporate a set of valid and reliable sub-scales and single-item measures. The TFNQ will facilitate research that aims to explore the contribution of teacher FN practices with teacher health and wellbeing and inform the development of practical lifestyle focused solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.