SynthesisBMC public health2026
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) measurement tools among children and adolescents in the Arab world: a scoping review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) significantly impact long-term health, yet culturally adapted measurement tools for Arab children and adolescents remain scarce.
objectivesThis scoping review systematically mapped ACEs assessment tools used in the Arab world, identifying key instruments and gaps.
methodsFollowing Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, six databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science) up to August 31st, 2025, including English and Arabic studies from 22 Arab countries.
resultsOf 19,714 screened records, 96 met inclusion criteria. Findings revealed diverse tools, with physical and emotional abuse most frequently assessed. Most studies were conducted in educational settings, while clinical and community contexts were underrepresented. Notably, few tools were validated or reliably adapted for Arab populations.
conclusionThe review underscores the need for culturally tailored psychometrically robust ACEs measures to improve assessment accuracy and intervention relevance in the Arab world. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: Research registry reviewregistry1763.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.