Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613560›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Designing theranostic radiopharmaceutical trials for uterine cervix cancer.

Denise Fabian, Molly E Buffington, Brianna S Cagle, Steve M Keefe, Michael K Schultz, Charles A Kunos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Denise FabianDepartment of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Molly E BuffingtonDepartment of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Brianna S CagleDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Steve M KeefePerspective Therapeutics, Seattle, WA, United States.
Michael K SchultzPerspective Therapeutics, Seattle, WA, United States.
Charles A KunosDepartment of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing and interpreting early phase trials of theranostic radiopharmaceuticals remains challenging because it is difficult to isolate effective levels of activity in enriched patient populations that would be worth following up in later-phase development. This study explores the known challenges and emerging opportunities for clinical research on patients with uterine cervical cancer. We identified eight randomized combination trials for advanced-stage uterine cervix cancer that were activated between 2011 and 2022 and tabulated their results to determine whether combinations were better than individual constituents and which suitable study population is best situated for the study of a new theranostic agent. In this overview, we discuss exploitable vulnerabilities and radiobiology of cancer-associated fibroblasts, as these stromal cells are targets for nuclear and therapeutic radiation medicine. We also discuss investigational drugs that hold promise for the theranostic treatment of persistent, recurrent, or metastatic uterine cervical cancer, including inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein-alpha and ribonucleotide reductase. In our expert opinion, the development of a theranostic radiopharmaceutical should pursue the eventual goal of being tested in a randomized phase II monotherapy setting.

Indexed as

fibroblast activation protein (FAP)Pb-203Pb-212radiopharmaceuticalradiotherapyuterine cervical cancer

Identifiers

PMID41613560
PMCPMC12846989

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.