ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2026
The impact of clinical manifestations on the prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the recurrence patterns of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and assess the significance of clinical manifestation consistency at the time of recurrence. Methods: A total of 141 patients who were newly diagnosed with DLBCL between January 2015 and October 2024 and who initially achieved complete remission but eventually developed relapsed disease during follow-up were retrospectively identified, their recurrence circumstances were assessed, and their clinical manifestations at diagnosis and recurrence were compared. The timing of recurrence was categorized as within 1 year of postchemotherapy or later. Results: A total of 113 (80.1%) patients presented with clinical manifestations leading to the diagnosis of recurrence. A total of 87 (61.7%) patients presented similar clinical manifestations at recurrence to those observed during initial diagnosis. Importantly, for patients who relapsed within 1 year of chemotherapy, those with inconsistent manifestations at recurrence had significantly poorer prognoses and lower survival rates (complete remission (CR) rate, 7.4%; 1-year overall survival (OS), 37.5%; 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), 18.5%) than those with consistent manifestations (CR rate, 20.8%; 1-year OS, 34.0%; 1-year PFS, 22.6%; PFS, Conclusion: The timing of recurrence and the consistency of clinical manifestations are important factors influencing the prognosis of DLBCL. Specifically, early recurrence with inconsistent manifestations is associated with worse outcomes, whereas recurrence with consistent manifestations 1 year postchemotherapy is correlated with an improved prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.