Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41613873›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2025

Biophysical perspectives of the spatiotemporal dynamics of plasma coagulation under flow.

Andrei D Megalinskii, Yury D Nechipurenko, Mikhail A Panteleev, Dmitry Yu Nechipurenko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrei D MegalinskiiCenter for Theoretical Problems of Physicochemical Pharmacology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 109029 Russia.ORCID 0009-0002-2705-2436
Yury D NechipurenkoLaboratory of DNA-Protein Interactions, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991 Russia.
Mikhail A PanteleevCenter for Theoretical Problems of Physicochemical Pharmacology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 109029 Russia.
Dmitry Yu NechipurenkoCenter for Theoretical Problems of Physicochemical Pharmacology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 109029 Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelation of blood plasma is key to normal hemostasis. The regulation of coagulation in blood flow has been studied for several decades, but the key problems in the field remain unresolved. Understanding the major mechanisms governing coagulation under flow conditions is important for the development of new diagnostic tools, therapeutic agents, and novel strategies addressing pathological states associated with both hypo- and hypercoagulation. In this review, we highlight the general features of plasma coagulation under flow conditions, including its spatiotemporal dynamics and threshold dependence on the key parameters. A short overview of in vitro and in silico models and important breakthroughs that became possible with their combination is followed by a brief introduction into the analysis of the balance between convection, diffusion, and reactions using Peclet and Damköhler numbers. We highlight the major unresolved challenges in the field and share an overall perspective of the future directions that might help to clarify the important questions that emerged during the last decade of intensive research.

Indexed as

Blood clottingBlood flowComputation modelingHemostasisMicrofluidicsPlasma coagulation

Identifiers

PMID41613873
PMCPMC12847499

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.