ArticleShoulder & elbow2026
Development of a clinical prediction model for chronic post-surgical shoulder pain following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A prospective cohort study.
Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is typically recommended when conservative management fails to provide symptom relief. Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) following ARCR is not uncommon and significantly reduces function and quality of life. This study aimed to develop a clinical prediction model for CPSP after ARCR. Methods: This prospective analysis included 103 participants who underwent ARCR between August 2022 and November 2024. Potential predictor outcome variables were recorded preoperatively, and postoperative pain was assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was CPSP at rest and on shoulder movements, which was measured at the 6-month follow-up. Results: Prediction models were developed using binomial logistic regression analysis and bootstrapping techniques for internal validation. Key independent predictors included scores on measures of Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale 21, and Central Sensitization Inventory, as well as the pressure pain threshold over the middle deltoid muscle on the affected side. Conclusion: Prediction models have been developed to forecast the occurrence of CPSP of the shoulder at 6 months post-ARCR. This represents a foundational step towards providing tailored risk evaluation, which can guide decisions regarding surgical management and therapeutic interventions for patients undergoing ARCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.