ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Advancing intradermal vaccine delivery: Focus on hollow microneedles and skin models.
Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissolving microneedles for inflammatory diseases: Advances in formulation strategies and therapeutic applications.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- An engineered intradermal microneedle-array device enhances the cellular immune responses in a guinea pig model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intradermal (ID) vaccine administration is a promising alternative to intramuscular injection yet remains underused, as the classically employed Mantoux technique is difficult to perform consistently. Hollow microneedles (HMNs) offer a more user-friendly approach for liquid vaccine delivery but face issues such as inconsistent skin piercing and inefficient liquid injection. To address these issues, in the preclinical phase, skin models are used that mimic the mechanical, structural, and immunological properties of human skin as well as the interaction between skin and needle. However, current models often fail to capture the entire biological complexity. This review discusses recent findings, challenges, and engineering solutions for reliable HMN skin piercing and liquid injection, alongside emerging trends in skin model technologies for vaccine delivery. Unique to this review paper is the final perspective, which highlights how advances in skin model technologies can be leveraged to accelerate and de-risk HMN development, streamlining the preclinical phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.