Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41615941›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

An interpretable machine learning framework for adverse drug reaction prediction from drug-target interactions.

Joseph Roberts-Nuttall, Alan M Jones, Marco Castellani, Duc Pham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph Roberts-NuttallSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
Alan M JonesSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3897-5626
Marco CastellaniSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
Duc PhamSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-2404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse drug reactions (ADRs) present challenges to patient safety and healthcare systems. Current pharmacovigilance methods, such as the Yellow Card Scheme (YCS), provide valuable post-marketing data, but the mechanistic causes of these ADRs are not fully understood. Leveraging drug-target interaction data with interpretable machine learning offers a promising approach to anticipate ADRs and understand their underlying mechanisms.

objectiveThis study proposes an interpretable machine learning (ML) framework to predict significant ADRs using drug-target interaction data. The framework aims to identify key pharmacological relationships, helping to inform drug safety.

methodsDrug-target interaction data from STITCH was combined with ADR reports from the YCS. Disproportionality analysis identified significant ADR signals which were used to train Random Forest classifiers across System Organ Class (SOC) categories. Class imbalance was addressed with SMOTE and Tomek, and Bayesian optimisation refined hyperparameters. Feature importance scores provided interpretability, and the top features were validated using known target-disease associations from DisGeNET.

resultsPrediction performance varied across SOC categories, with ROC AUC scores up to 0.94. Feature importance analysis identified pharmacologically relevant targets, validated using DisGeNET and comparisons with SIDER highlighted the added value of real-world data.

conclusionsThe interpretable ML framework links drug-target interactions to ADRs, offering a promising approach for predictive pharmacovigilance (PPV) and supporting safer drug development.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMachine LearningAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsBayes TheoremClassification AlgorithmsHumansPharmacovigilancePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID41615941
PMCPMC12858017

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.