Evidence mapPaperPMID 41615946Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

A randomized controlled trial in healthy participants to compare the insulinogenic effects of whey protein and pea protein co-ingested with glucose.

Pariyarath Sangeetha Thondre, Elysia Young, Sam Pledger, Sarah Kefyalew, Isabel Hatami, Caroline Perreau, Laetitia Guérin Deremaux, Catherine Lefranc-Millot, Jonathan Tammam

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04871971 (Glycaemic Response and Insulinaemic Response for Nutralys S85 Plus and Whey Protein), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04871971 nacompletednot on this map

Glycaemic Response and Insulinaemic Response for Nutralys S85 Plus and Whey Protein

TypeinterventionalSponsorOxford Brookes UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsHealthyArms10 g NUTRALYS®S85 Plus pea protein, 20 g NUTRALYS®S85 Plus pea protein, 10 g Whey protein concentrate, 20 g Whey protein concentrate, 50 g Glucose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pariyarath Sangeetha ThondreOxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2065-8443
Elysia YoungOxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
Sam PledgerOxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
Sarah KefyalewOxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
Isabel HatamiOxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
Caroline PerreauRoquette, Life Sciences R&D., Lestrem, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2475-3085
Laetitia Guérin DeremauxRoquette, Life Sciences R&D., Lestrem, France.
Catherine Lefranc-MillotRoquette, Life Sciences R&D., Lestrem, France.
Jonathan TammamOxford Brookes Centre for Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing protein content of foods is effective in reducing postprandial hyperglycaemia, but animal protein may exacerbate insulin sensitivity. This single-blind, randomised, crossover study compared the effects of co-ingesting glucose with 10 or 20 g whey protein and glucose with 10 or 20 g pea protein, with a reference product (glucose) on glycaemic and insulinaemic responses in 30 healthy individuals. Blood glucose and plasma insulin were measured at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 minutes after product consumption. The trial was registered with Clinical Trials.gov (NCT04871971). Glucose incremental area under the curve (mmol/l*min) at 180 minutes was significantly reduced (p < 0.001) for glucose with 20 g pea protein (89.8 ± 51.6) and glucose with 20g whey protein (98.5 ± 58.0) compared to glucose (143.2 ± 74.0). Insulin incremental area under the curve at 180 minutes (µU/ml*min) for glucose with 20 g pea protein (4304.56 ± 1896.07) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than glucose with 20g whey protein (6311.81 ± 3489.12). This study has shown a superior effect of pea protein over whey protein in reducing glycaemic response, without any excessive increase in insulinaemic response.

Indexed as

GlucoseInsulinPea ProteinsWhey ProteinsAdultBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultBlood GlucoseGlucoseInsulinPea ProteinsWhey Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41615946
PMCPMC12857942

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.