ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring patient satisfaction with community pharmacy services in the United Arab Emirates: Implications for quality improvement.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of community pharmacists regarding the care of children with autism spectrum disorder: a cross-sectional study in the United Arab Emirates.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Advancing interprofessional collaboration: exploring physicians' perceptions, preferences, and barriers regarding pharmacists' roles in Jordan.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient satisfaction is a critical metric for enhancing service quality, meeting regulatory standards, and validating patient-reported outcomes in healthcare. Community pharmacies play a vital role in healthcare delivery, yet there is limited research on patient satisfaction with these services in the UAE.
aimsThis study aims to identify key factors influencing patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care services provided by community pharmacies in the UAE.
methodsA cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted from December 1st, 2023, to April 30th, 2024. A systematic intercept sampling method was used to ensure a representative sample of 505 patients from various regions of the UAE. Data were collected through structured questionnaires covering demographic details, pharmacy visit experiences, and satisfaction levels. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests, t-tests, and binary logistic regression, were performed using SPSS 27.
resultsThe study found that most participants most frequently used chain pharmacies (62.38%) and were highly satisfied with factors like lighting (91.29%) and pharmacist attentiveness (83.96%). Key drivers of satisfaction included convenient locations, accessible designs, and communication-related factors.. However, challenges such as the lack of private counseling areas (59.01%), limited access to medical files (77.62%), and inadequate prescription areas for private conversations (53.29%) were highlighted. Satisfaction was significantly lower in the Northern Emirates compared to Abu Dhabi, while differences involving Al Ain did not reach statistical significance. Providing sufficient time for medication advice (OR: 16.21, p < 0.001) and ease of waiting times (OR: 4.29, p = 0.016) improved satisfaction.
conclusionThe findings underscore the importance of both environmental and interpersonal factors in shaping patient satisfaction with community pharmacies. Enhancing pharmacy accessibility, communication, and the quality of pharmacist-patient interactions can significantly improve patient experiences. Future research should further explore overall satisfaction and investigate targeted improvements in pharmacy practices across different regions and settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.