ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
The Effect of Evening Technology Use on Objective Sleep in Older Adults: Protocol for a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evening technology use (ETU) has been associated with sleep disturbances, often attributed to blue light exposure and cognitive arousal. However, most of the existing evidence focuses on younger populations and relies primarily on subjective measures. As older adults increasingly engage with both passive and active technology use, it is important to investigate how ETU impacts objective sleep. Currently, there is also a limited understanding of how particular evening digital activities, especially active versus passive engagement, affect objective sleep in older adults. Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of exposure to ETU on both objective and subjective sleep outcomes in older adults. Methods: This is a randomized crossover trial involving approximately 55 adults aged 60-75 years from the ongoing Swedish National Study on Aging and Care - Blekinge. Each participant will undergo 3 one-week intervention periods: active ETU, passive ETU, and a nondigital activity (book reading), with one-week washout periods in between. The order of interventions will be randomized. Sleep will be assessed using a home-based electroencephalography device (MUSE headband) and daily self-reports. Primary outcomes are sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset. Secondary outcomes include objective measures such as total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and time spent in REM, deep, and light sleep, subjective sleep quality, adherence, and perception of the intervention and comfort of using the objective measurement tool, that is, the electroencephalography headband. Linear mixed-effects models (with fixed effects for condition and period and a random participant intercept) were used to analyze crossover effects on sleep outcomes. Results: Participant recruitment and data collection began in the fall of 2025 and will continue through summer 2026 or until the target sample size is reached. Data collection is scheduled to be completed by spring 2027. Results will include participant flow, baseline characteristics, adherence data, and comparative analyses of the 3 intervention conditions. Within-subject statistical models will be used to evaluate differences in sleep outcomes and investigate the associations between ETU and sleep quality. Conclusions: This crossover study will clarify how active and passive ETU, compared with a nondigital activity, relate to objective sleep in older adults. Findings will inform simple, practical recommendations for technology use before bed in late life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.