ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026
Alzheimer's disease diagnosis support for brain perfusion SPECT scans in a real-world clinical cohort.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundDementia diagnosis is challenging and often delayed. Brain imaging techniques such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging can help identify subtle changes in brain perfusion. Artificial intelligence methods may support results interpretation for early diagnosis.ObjectiveTo develop and validate multivariate models for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), using brain perfusion SPECT imaging and interpretable artificial intelligence methods in a real-world clinical setting.MethodsTwo logistic regression models were developed using a training dataset of 420 SPECT scans and tested on an independent clinical dataset of 443 scans. Model 1 was designed to identify abnormal perfusion patterns, while Model 2 identified perfusion changes associated with AD. Input features were extracted from anatomical volumes of interest, with feature selection performed using the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR) algorithm.ResultsThe models demonstrated good classification performance using real-world clinical data. Model 1 achieved an area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) Curve of 0.89 (Sensitivity 76%, Specificity 87%) in identifying abnormal brain perfusion. Model 2 achieved an AUROC of 0.86 (Sensitivity 87%, Specificity 72%) in identifying AD.ConclusionsMultivariate logistic regression models trained on real-world clinical data show promise as clinical decision support tools for the diagnosis of AD from brain perfusion SPECT imaging. The models use features from clinically relevant brain regions, which enhances interpretability. Future research should focus on expanding model applicability to other dementia types and on prospective evaluation of their utility in improving diagnostic accuracy, consistency, and care pathways in diverse clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.