ArticleScientific reports2026
Leveraging metabolic similarity in a
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural products remain a central resource for drug discovery, and increasing evidence suggests that therapeutic effects often arise from the combined action of multiple constituents rather than single compounds. In this context, metabolomic profiling is essential for comparing complex plant chemical phenotypes, and 1H NMR provides robust whole-profile fingerprints that support cross-species metabolic barcoding and systematic comparison. In this study, we establish and apply a standardized large-scale 1H NMR database to enable macroscopic metabolomic similarity profiling of medicinal plants. Specifically, using 1H NMR profiles from 656 traditional medicinal herbs, we demonstrate how this standardized large-scale metabolomic framework can be applied to key challenges in medicinal plant research, including quality control across different locations and time periods, identification of metabolically similar alternative species, and compositional analysis of multi-herb formulations. Our findings demonstrate the utility of this NMR-based strategy as a scalable approach for standardization, authentication, and holistic characterization of medicinal plants, advancing the field beyond reductionist paradigms. This study establishes a standardized large-scale 1H NMR database of medicinal plants and introduces a macroscopic framework for large-scale metabolomic similarity profiling that enables chemotaxonomic contextualization, quality surveillance, and identification of metabolically similar candidate substitutes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.