ArticleScientific reports2026
The relationship between health promotion and renewable energy sources in the attitudes of Polish medical students.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between attitudes toward health promotion and attitudes toward renewable energy sources among young adults. The study was conducted among 504 medical students, with an average age of 22.33 years. The mean level of intensity of pro-renewable energy attitude was 9.2 points (out of 15 points), and the mean level of pro-health attitude was 16.85 points (out of 22 points). Statistical analysis was used to assess the relationship between variables. All values of the coefficient of statistical significance (p) below 0.05 were interpreted as indicating significant relationships. Pro-renewable energy attitudes were higher among women (p = 0.043), left-leaning individuals (p = 0.001), and part-time students (p = 0.032). Pro-health attitudes were higher among individuals with strong religious commitment (p = 0.001), those who rated their health as very good (p = 0.001), and those studying dietetics (p = 0.027). It turned out that the higher the level of health-promoting attitude, the higher the level of pro-ecological attitude (p < 0.001). Attitudes in favor of renewable energy sources varied by gender, political views, and field of study. Pro-health attitudes varied by religious commitment, self-assessed health, and field of study. The higher the level of health-promoting attitude, the higher the level of pro-renewable energy attitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.