Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618281›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2026

Pedicled versus free flap reconstruction in head and neck surgery: analysis of complications and quality of life.

Xiaoqin Ji, Xin Yang, Zheng Jiang, Huiling Zhao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoqin Ji *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China.
Xin Yang *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China.
Zheng JiangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China.
Huiling ZhaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Road, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China. 15710087@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to systematically compare free flaps and pedicled flaps in patients with head and neck cancer. By tracking postoperative complications, psychosocial adaptation, and quality of life through long-term follow-up, this research seeks to provide evidence-based, individualized flap repair strategies to reduce complications and improve overall treatment outcomes and quality of life.

methodsIn this single-center, clinical data of head and neck cancer patients undergoing flap reconstruction (2018–2024) were retrospectively extracted. Psychological and quality-of-life outcomes were prospectively collected at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively using validated scales (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 and Head and Neck Module 35, Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale). Variables were selected based on clinical relevance. The Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the risk factors for postoperative complications and length of hospital stay after flap reconstruction.

resultsAmong 736 head and neck cancer patients undergoing flap reconstruction, 178 (24.2%) and 558 (75.8%) received free and pedicled flaps, respectively. Complications occurred in 234 (31.8%) of patients, with flap-related and systemic complications accounting for 127 (17.3%) and 155 (21.1%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified Prothrombin time (OR = 1.26, 95% CI [1.01–1.58], p = 0.037) as a significant predictor of flap-related complications. Hypertension (OR = 1.85, 95% CI [1.22–2.82], p = 0.0039) increases the risk of systemic complications. Surgical duration exceeding three hours (OR = 2.4, 95% CI [1.21–4.79], p = 0.012; OR = 1.75, 95% CI [1.01–3.04], p = 0.045), N3 stage (OR = 1.76, 95% CI [0.74–4.17], p = 0.2; OR = 3.2, 95% CI [1.47–6.95], p = 0.00341) experience a higher incidence of both flap-related and systemic complications. Psychological health assessments showed that the pedicled flap group had significantly higher Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale score than the free flap group at both three and six months post-surgery (42.3 ± 6.1 vs. 40.1 ± 7.3, p = 0.025; and 44.7 ± 5.5 vs. 41.6 ± 6.7, p = 0.002, respectively). Evaluations using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 and Head and Neck Module 35 scales confirmed that flap type did not affect any quality of life dimension.

conclusionThis study identified predictors of postoperative flap-related complications in head and neck reconstruction, including prolonged prothrombin time, surgery duration exceeding 3 h, hypertension, and advanced T stage. Furthermore, it revealed that patients receiving pedicled flaps reported higher postoperative depression scores, highlighting the importance of psychological considerations in surgical planning. Collectively, these findings provide a multidimensional evidence base for developing personalized preoperative reconstruction strategies.

Indexed as

Free Tissue FlapsHead and Neck NeoplasmsPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeSurgical FlapsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesFree tissue flapsHead and neck neoplasmsPostoperative complicationsQuality of lifeSurgical flaps

Identifiers

PMID41618281
PMCPMC12947532

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.