Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618336›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Alpacas' behavior during physical examination, and its relationships with health indicators and alpaca caretaker's questionnaire survey.

Monika Budzyńska, Joanna Kapustka, Magdalena Podobińska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monika BudzyńskaDepartment of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, Lublin, 20-950, Poland.
Joanna KapustkaDepartment of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, Lublin, 20-950, Poland. joanna.kapustka@up.lublin.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8175-7299
Magdalena PodobińskaDepartment of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, Lublin, 20-950, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBehavioral responses during examinations can reflect stress and ease of handling. This study aimed to determine alpacas' behavioral responses to body score and health assessment during physical examination, and to investigate correlations between alpacas' behavior during physical examination (mean behavior score was computed for each animal based on the assessment of its behavioral responses: ease of introduction to the box, response to fixation, body language, vocalization, kicking, and spitting, on a 3-point scale), body condition score (BCS, on a 5-point scale) and other health indicators (on a 5-point scale), and caretaker questionnaire survey (based on evaluation of the individual's behavioral characteristics and its ease of handling, using a 5-point Likert scale).

resultsThirty alpacas (17 females, 13 males) took part in the study. The studied animals did not show many behavioral signs of stress during physical examinations, with a mean behavioral score of 1.33, and most of them were assessed with a BCS of 3.0, indicating their good condition. Spitting was negatively correlated with BCS and eye mucous membrane color, suggesting a potential link between animal stress and health. The duration of the physical examination was most influenced by the ease of introduction to the assessment box. Moreover, shorter examination times were associated with desirable traits such as gentleness and adaptation to new situations, assessed in the caretaker questionnaire survey. Females showed more stress-related behaviors during physical examination, and it took longer to examine them compared to males, although no sex differences were found in BCS and other health indicators or survey traits.

conclusionsPhysical examination is not a significantly stressful procedure for alpacas. However, some difficulties were noted during the introduction of the animal to the examination box, and signs of anxiety were observed in its body language. The results indicate a relationship between behavior assessment during physical examination and desirable traits assessed in the caretaker questionnaire. This study suggests that the future consideration of behavior indicators during human-animal relation could be helpful in evaluating alpacas' health risks. The proposed assessment protocol combining behavior, the BCS and other health indicators offers a practical tool for breeders to monitor alpaca welfare.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCamelids, New WorldPhysical ExaminationAnimalsFemaleMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAlpacaBehaviorHerd managementPhysical examinationQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID41618336
PMCPMC12930596

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.