Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41618508›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2026

Skim-sequencing for genomic selection in wheat: a comparison of marker platforms.

Jared L Crain, José Crossa, Lee DeHaan, Susanne Dreisigacker, Jesse Poland, Ravi P Singh, Paolo Vitale

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jared L CrainDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, 4024 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9484-8325
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9429-5855
Lee DeHaanThe Land Institute, Salina, Kansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-5241
Susanne DreisigackerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-5989
Jesse PolandPlant Science Program, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7856-1399
Ravi P SinghInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4676-5071
Paolo VitaleInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4353-5828

Funding

The role of prestimulus oscillatory brain dynamics in auditory memoryP20GM113109 · NIGMS · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI David Edward Thompson · 2017 to 2026
$24.1M
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research CA19-SS-0000000146NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113109Perennial Agriculture ProjectUnited States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-A-13-00051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of genomics-assisted breeding relies on efficient, affordable, and abundant molecular markers. Leveraging modern sequencing technology, commercial laboratory products, and open-source software, we demonstrate how ultra-low whole-genome sequencing coverage (skim-seq, 0.05-0.10x) can be a viable marker platform. The direct generation of sequence data followed by imputation provides an opportunity to implement genomic selection while being robust to future genomic (changes in reference genome) and technological (improvement in sequencing capacity) changes. We genotyped 1709 wheat (Triticum aestivum) lines with genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), a mid-density DArTAG single nucleotide polymorphism panel, and skim-seq (0.07x). All skim-seq samples were used to identify loci variants using a reference genome without the aid of any high-coverage samples. STITCH software was used for imputation to obtain 121,437 markers. Comparing high-confidence STITCH imputed loci (approximately 65,000 of 14 M imputed loci) to high-coverage samples resulted in the correct imputation for more than 97.5% of the markers. Using phenotypic data, a fivefold cross validation was implemented for each marker platform. No one marker system performed the best in all test cases, with GBS often resulting in the highest correlation between observed and predicted values. The skim-seq correlations were typically within 0.03 of GBS, suggesting skim-seq can be a viable marker strategy for genomic prediction. As technology and computational pipelines advance, skim-seq appears to be a promising method to bridge the gap between targeted genotyping and whole-genome sequencing. The skim-seq method is highly flexible and can be optimized to a variety of program needs, potentially allowing for wide adoption by the plant breeding community.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantTriticumWhole Genome SequencingGenetic MarkersGenomicsGenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID41618508
PMCPMC12871549

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.