ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Combining detection dogs with air extraction methodology to expose wildlife trafficking in containerized cargo.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combining detection dogs with air extraction methodology to expose wildlife trafficking in containerized cargo.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Persistent demand for wildlife-derived products perpetuates international trafficking and the exploitation of legitimate globalized transport networks. The annual movement of millions of shipping cargo containers, of which few are inspected due to resource constraints, facilitates the smuggling of large quantities of wildlife contraband. Rapid, noninvasive screening tools are essential for border control agencies to effectively detect and intercept wildlife trafficking attempts, though such tools are currently limited. Detection dog programs could be highly effective in this context; however, their capacity to screen large volumes of cargo without disrupting port operations remains a challenge. We explored the feasibility of pairing an air extraction device, which samples air from sealed containers, with canine detection to improve screening measures. To evaluate this method, we used pelts from adult specimens of the African lion (Panthera leo), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), leopard (Panthera pardus), snow leopard (Panthera uncia), and tiger (Panthera tigris) concealed in containers to simulate smuggling scenarios. On average across the container configurations trialed, the detection dog achieved high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6%, 95% CI 95.1-100.0) and specificity (84.8%, 95% CI 79.1-90.6). Detection accuracy was not significantly influenced by airflow conditions (extraction only vs. mixed-mode ventilation) or pelt arrangement within the containers. These findings highlight the potential of this approach in enhancing the detection of concealed wildlife products. However, the air extraction protocol must be validated under real-world operational conditions to confirm its practicability. Through the integration of extraction-based air sampling into existing screening frameworks, this approach could offer a scalable, noninvasive strategy to strengthen wildlife trafficking detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.