Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41620213›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2026

Evaluating the Impact of Prophylactic Administration of Ivermectin on the Fecal Microbiome of Healthy C57BL/6J Mice (Mus musculus).

Catherine E Pope, Rheinallt M Jones, Ammar A Rashied, Tamas Nagy, Wai H Hanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine E PopeDivision of Animal Resources, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Rheinallt M JonesDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ammar A RashiedDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; and.
Tamas NagyDepartment of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
Wai H HansonDivision of Animal Resources, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon importation, laboratory mice may undergo prophylactic antiparasitic treatment during quarantine to prevent the introduction of parasites into established colonies. While quarantine protocols vary across institutions, ivermectin is commonly used, administered either orally or topically. However, the impact of these practices on the fecal microbiome remains poorly understood, raising concerns about unintended consequences for experimental outcomes. This study investigated the effects of ivermectin on fecal microbiome composition in naïve, healthy male and female C57BL/6J mice. Animals received either ivermectin-impregnated feed (12 ppm, ad libitum for 4 weeks), weekly topical ivermectin solution (2.0 mg/kg for 4 weeks), or no treatment (controls). Fecal samples were collected for 16S rRNA-based microbiome analysis before ivermectin treatment, immediately posttreatment, and 4 weeks after treatment cessation. Weekly body weights were recorded, and histopathologic evaluation of the small intestine and colon was performed at study completion. Both oral and topical ivermectin treatments resulted in significant alterations in microbiome α and β diversity at the end of treatment, with more pronounced effects observed in female mice. Some of these changes persisted for up to 4 weeks after treatment cessation. Furthermore, the findings indicate a sex-specific effect of ivermectin on specific bacterial orders, with Bacillales predominantly affected in male mice, whereas Coriobacteriales and Bacteriodales were primarily impacted in female mice. During treatment, males receiving topical ivermectin weighed significantly less than controls, while females receiving dietary ivermectin weighed significantly more. Histopathological analysis revealed no abnormalities in intestinal tissues across all groups at 4 weeks posttreatment. These findings demonstrate that ivermectin administration induces measurable and persistent changes in the fecal microbiome of healthy mice. Researchers should consider these effects when designing experiments, and institutions must weigh the benefits of colony protection against potential microbiome-related confounding variables.

Indexed as

BD, Bray-Curtis dissimilarityCON, control group; DIET, ivermectin diet groupPCoA, principal coordinate analysisREML, restricted/residual maximum likelihoodTOP, topical ivermectin group

Identifiers

PMID41620213
PMCPMC13086207

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.