ReviewClinical and molecular hepatology2026
Post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma: balancing immunosuppression and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Review in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review Article: Biomarkers in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Towards Precision Medicine.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Drug-resistant bacterial infections in end-stage liver disease: immune imbalance and intervention advances.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens have markedly improved early post-transplant survival. However, long-term outcomes remain compromised by HCC recurrence, chronic rejection, metabolic complications, and de novo malignancies. Recurrence of HCC after LT remains a major clinical challenge, with available prognostic models providing limited accuracy in risk stratification. Simultaneously, systemic therapies for unresectable HCC have rapidly advanced, particularly with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), providing new opportunities and unique challenges in transplant settings. With ICIs carrying a risk of acute and potentially fatal rejection and lacking controlled data on efficacy or safety in the post-transplant setting, tyrosine kinase inhibitors currently represent a standard option for post-transplant recurrence. Novel biomarkers, such as donor-derived cell-free DNA and the gut microbiome, are emerging as potential tools to refine risk stratification and guide immunosuppression. Furthermore, innovative immunotherapies, including oncolytic viruses and mRNA vaccines, are being explored as tumor-specific approaches. Collectively, these advances may reshape future management of LT recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.