Evidence mapPaperPMID 41623484Full record

ReviewiScience2026

Artificial intelligence for colposcopic and cytological image analysis in early cervical cancer detection.

Xiaodong Wang, Qianqian Wang, Gouping Ding, Junjie Wang, Yixuan Tang, Yeqian Feng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaodong WangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Qianqian WangDepartment of Oncology, Zhuzhou Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Zhuzhou, China.
Gouping DingDepartment of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Junjie WangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.
Yixuan TangDepartment of Oncology, Zhuzhou Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Zhuzhou, China.
Yeqian FengDepartment of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping cervical cancer screening by automating interpretation of cytology, colposcopic, and related imaging to improve early detection, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This review synthesizes advances in preprocessing; segmentation; representation learning; and supervised, semi-supervised, unsupervised, and transformer-based models, with emphasis on multimodal fusion with HPV testing, spectroscopy, and MRI. Across retrospective datasets and growing real-world deployments, AI systems can achieve high accuracy and sensitivity, accelerate workflows, reduce costs, and expand coverage via portable and edge-computing devices. However, translation is constrained by data bias, variable image quality, opaque decision-making, and fragmented regulation. We outline requirements for clinically robust and equitable deployment, including diverse multi-center datasets, federated and privacy-preserving learning, explainable interfaces, standardized validation with histopathologic endpoints, and clinician-in-the-loop workflows. Finally, we highlight future directions such as hybrid explainable AI with large language models, multi-omics integration, and adaptive models resilient to data drift.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence applicationsMedical imagingOncology

Identifiers

PMID41623484
PMCPMC12857404

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.