ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2025
Evaluation of the effectiveness of teledentistry on diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning among Jordanian dentists.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning agreement among Jordanian dentists when using teledentistry. Methods: Thirty children underwent dental examinations. Standardized intraoral photographs and brief case histories from pediatric patients were compiled into clinical case scenarios. Eight representative cases were selected and presented in a Google Forms survey to licensed dentists in Jordan. Participants reviewed the cases, providing clinical diagnoses and proposing treatment plans. Responses were analyzed to determine diagnostic accuracy and agreement on treatment planning. Results: Diagnostic agreement was highest for cases with distinct clinical presentations. Case #5 (early childhood caries) showed the highest agreement at 92.1%, followed by Case #3 (avulsion; 91.1%) and Case #6 (ectopic eruption; 85.1%). Treatment planning agreement followed a similar pattern. The highest concordance was reported for Case #4 (molar-incisor hypomineralization; 64.4%) and Case #7(Functional class III/anterior crossbite 59.4%). Conclusion: Teledentistry enables high diagnostic accuracy among Jordanian dentists, especially in pediatric cases with well-defined presentations. However, the observed variability in treatment planning highlights the need for standardized clinical guidelines and targeted professional development to optimize teledentistry's integration into routine dental care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.