ReviewDigital health
A systematic literature review of digital mental health interventions in providing support for children and their families.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an online intervention for parents/guardians of children aged 4-7 years old who are concerned about their children's emotional and behavioural development: EMERGENT study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Trial
- Digital Humanities in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: A Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children's mental health issues are widespread in the United Kingdom, yet access to traditional services remains limited. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) offer a scalable alternative by reducing barriers such as cost, stigma, and location. However, most DMHIs target either children or parents individually, overlooking the potential of combined approaches. Objective: This review assessed the effectiveness of DMHIs that include both parent- and child-delivered components for children aged 12 and under. The review also examined user experiences and compared DMHIs with traditional mental health support services. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, searching six electronic databases. Studies were included if they evaluated DMHIs involving both children and parents/guardians, focused on mental health outcomes, and were peer-reviewed. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were performed independently by reviewers. Results: Of 3703 screened studies, three randomised controlled trials ( Conclusions: DMHIs that incorporate both parent and child components are comparatively rare but show promise as a valid means of enhancing child and parent well-being. However, further research is needed to refine these interventions, address barriers to engagement, and optimise their broader application, particularly in community settings, to help reduce the pressure on clinical services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.