ReviewJournal of pathology informatics2026
Biological feature-based machine learning in histopathological images: a systematic review.
Review in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomic prediction of early progression at 2 years post-treatment in patients with resectable rectal cancer based on rectal tumor and mesentery characteristics: a two-center study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research: Modality Dependence and Limited Visual-Spatial Integration in Multimodal Large Language Models for Breast Cancer Histopathology.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital pathology has recently led to significant advancements in the field of microscopic image analysis, particularly regarding the increasing use of Deep Learning methods. These models represent the state-of-the-art in histopathological slide analysis, but Deep Learning features remain difficult to interpret, despite recent developments in post hoc explainability frameworks. In contrast, features extracted from biological objects-such as nuclei, cells or tissues-are supposed to be more grounded in pathologists' a priori knowledge. Accordingly, Machine Learning based on handcrafted features represents another paradigm of explainability and may stand as a complementary method to Deep Learning to assist pathologists. In order to perceive how biological features have been used in hematoxylin & eosin microscopic images to address medical questions, we conducted a systematic review of articles published from January 2005 to May 2025, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. A total of 97 articles were analyzed from the PubMed, IEEE, and ACM databases. Three primary categories of features-texture/color, morphology and topology-were both identified and thoroughly described. These features were most frequently derived from segmented cells and tissues in 80 and 28 studies, respectively. They were used to address seven types of medical questions: "normal vs diseased", disease subtyping, tumor grading, phenotyping, object detection, prognosis and treatment-response prediction. We discussed methodological and reporting limitations of these studies, highlighting the difficulty to assess the potential impact of such methods. Among the most common concerns, we found features difficult to interpret, data leakage, and inadequate sample sizes. Nevertheless, we also focused on promising domain-inspired feature engineering that provides better explainability and specificity. This kind of features associated with more methodological rigor may increase the relevance and reliability of AI models, and also raise new research avenues in pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.