ReviewAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Progress in risk assessment and management: Forecasting updates across international cholesterol guidelines.
Review in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In anticipation of updates to cholesterol guidelines globally, evidence since the most recent iteration of recommendations across US and Europe for risk assessment and lipid management are reviewed. ASCVD risk estimation is at the core of determining lipid lowering goals and consideration for therapies. In primary prevention, incorporation of the PREVENT equations will be featured in updated guidelines, which will likely demarcate new, lower risk thresholds compared to the prior Pooled Cohort Equations. Additionally, the use of coronary artery calcium (CAC) improves risk estimation to inform medication allocation and LDL-C goals beyond traditional risk factor risk estimation. To achieve lower LDL-C, many adults will need multiple lipid-lowering medications. For high-risk individuals, combination therapy with low/moderate intensity statin and ezetimibe or bempedoic acid should be considered. Additionally, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) therapies can be used to attain lower LDL-C in high-risk individuals, including those with clinical ASCVD or a high CAC burden. In very-high risk patients, treatment to LDL-C values as low as <30 mg/dL further reduces ASCVD risk without significant adverse events. Among individuals treated with PSCK9i therapy, those with elevated Lp(a) may have greater ASCVD risk reduction and may be a patient population that is prioritized for PCSK9i until therapies directly targeting Lp(a) are available. An ASCVD risk-based approach should be the foundation for determining LDL-C goals with consideration that multiple lipid-lowering therapies are often necessary for high and very-high risk patients who were treated to very low LDL-C in more recent randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.