ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2025
The controversial role of nutraceuticals vs. drugs in proliferative retinopathies.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anthocyanins as Adjunctive Dietary Modulators of the Gut-Eye Axis: Bioavailability, Biotransformation, and Implications for Ocular Health.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neovascular eye diseases, notably age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy, remain major causes of vision loss despite advances in pharmacological management. The proliferation of abnormal retinal blood vessels leads to the loss of retinal cells and progressive visual dysfunction. Anti-VEGF therapies have revolutionized treatment; however, their efficacy is incomplete, they require repeated administration, and resistance or suboptimal responses are not uncommon. These limitations have stimulated interest in additional therapeutic approaches, both inspired by preclinical research and aimed at improving the management of systemic conditions that contribute to neovascular pathologies. Beyond conventional pharmacology, nutraceuticals have attracted attention for their proposed mechanisms-enhancement of antioxidant defenses, modulation of inflammatory cascades, and potential interference with angiogenic signaling-which provide a molecular rationale for their application in ocular disease. This review critically examines the dual landscape of current pharmacological strategies and nutraceutical approaches, analyzing how the latter might enhance retinal resilience and vascular stability in the early stages of disease. The novelty of this work lies in juxtaposing the mechanistic underpinnings of nutraceuticals with the clinical shortcomings of anti-VEGF therapy, thereby identifying opportunities for integrative therapeutic perspectives. Nevertheless, nutraceuticals cannot replace pharmacological treatment in advanced disease; rather, they may offer incremental benefits in early-stage or high-risk patients, contingent upon timely preventive diagnosis. Until more robust clinical evidence and regulatory oversight are established, nutraceuticals should be regarded as adjunctive components within personalized care models-supporting, but not substituting for, established pharmacological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.