ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Pharmacotherapeutic considerations of selective estrogen receptor modulators for vascular protection.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidative Stress and Male Infertility: A Critical Analysis of Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Methods.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of Hypertension in Women: Interactions Between Vascular Ageing, Metabolic Dysfunction, and Hormonal Regulation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are nonsteroidal compounds that exert context-dependent agonist or antagonist effects on estrogen receptors through ligand-induced conformational changes that govern coactivator or corepressor recruitment. This biochemical selectivity underlies their tissue-specific pharmacological actions. In the vasculature, SERMs modulate endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity, attenuate vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation, and regulate oxidative stress pathways, while also influencing platelet reactivity through NADPH oxidase-dependent mechanisms. Among the most studied SERMs are Tamoxifen and Raloxifene. Tamoxifen functions as a prodrug, requiring hepatic bioactivation, primarily by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, to form active metabolites, notably 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen, with enhanced receptor affinity. In contrast, raloxifene undergoes extensive glucuronidation, resulting in low systemic bioavailability of the active compound. However, the systemic concentrations achieved are sufficient to confer measurable vascular effects. Despite these pharmacokinetic differences, both agents improve lipid and fibrinogen profiles, but also increase venous thromboembolism risk through modulation of coagulation pathways. Clinical trials confirm benefits in oncology and bone health, yet fail to demonstrate consistent reductions in cardiovascular endpoints. The pharmacological profile of SERMs therefore reflects a delicate equilibrium between receptor-mediated vascular protection and thrombotic liability. Indeed, their raison d'être increasingly extends beyond oncology into cardiovascular endocrine pharmacology, where they serve as prototypes for designing next-generation agents with optimized receptor selectivity and safer vascular outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.