ArticleMaterials today. Bio2026
Colloid-patterned surfaces distinguish malignant mechanophenotypes.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and rapid identification of aggressive cancer cells remains a major clinical challenge. Here, we present a simple, label-free mechanophenotyping platform that integrates controlled colloidal topographies with particle-uptake measurements to reveal biophysical traits associated with metastatic progression. Non-close-packed polystyrene bead arrays were formed on cell culture plates by controlled deposition and stabilized with a thin silicon oxide coating. These arrays display micro- and nano-features with a size range of 0.23-2.3 μm at diverse densities and were used to assess adhesion across cancer cells exhibiting different levels of malignancy. Particle uptake differences were most pronounced for particle diameters above 0.5 μm, whereas adhesion differences emerged predominantly on particles ≥0.7 μm and increased progressively with larger particle sizes. Colloidal topographies were fabricated at particle deposition concentrations of 500 μg/mL and 1000 μg/mL, and adhesion differences were observed under both conditions, with more potent effects at the higher concentration. At the metastatic site, cells exhibited increased particle uptake, stronger adhesion, and a larger morphological engagement on colloid-coated substrates, characterized by extensive actin-rich protrusions wrapping individual particles. AFM force mapping confirmed higher adhesion forces to a colloidal probe, while transcriptomic profiling revealed enrichment of adhesion and ECM-remodeling pathways in the adhesive metastatic state. We also find that lymphatically selected cells exhibit reduced adhesion on colloid-coated surfaces but higher particle uptake compared to the primary tumor cells. These results indicate that after leaving the primary tumor, metastatic cells have reduced adhesive potential, which is only regained upon reaching secondary sites. By exposing adhesion differences that are undetectable on flat substrates and linking them to particle uptake assays, this platform produces functional signatures of metastatic potential. This method is technically accessible, compatible with imaging and molecular workflows, and adaptable for high-throughput or clinical analysis, offering a potential route for label-free detection and classification of cancer cells by their aggressiveness.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.