Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624614›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency medicine2026

Development and validation of machine learning-based in-hospital mortality predictive models for acute aortic syndrome in emergency departments.

Yuanwei Fu, Yilan Yang, Hua Zhang, Daidai Wang, Qiangrong Zhai, Lanfang Du, Nijiati Muyesai, Yanxia Gao, Qingbian Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuanwei Fu1Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Yilan Yang1Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Hua Zhang3Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Daidai Wang1Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Qiangrong Zhai1Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Lanfang Du1Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Nijiati Muyesai4Department of Emergency Medicine, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830001, China.
Yanxia Gao5Department of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Qingbian Ma1Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to develop and validate a machine learning-based in-hospital mortality predictive model for acute aortic syndrome (AAS) in the emergency department (ED) and to derive a simplified version suitable for rapid clinical application.

methodsIn this multi-center retrospective cohort study, AAS patient data from three hospitals were analyzed. The modeling cohort included data from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and the People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, with Peking University Third Hospital data serving as the external test set. Four machine learning algorithms-logistic regression (LR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB), and random forest (RF)-were used to develop predictive models based on 34 early-accessible clinical variables. A simplified model was then derived based on five key variables (Stanford type, pericardial effusion, asymmetric peripheral arterial pulsation, decreased bowel sounds, and dyspnea) via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression to improve ED applicability.

resultsA total of 929 patients were included in the modeling cohort, and 210 were included in the external test set. Four machine learning models based on 34 clinical variables were developed, achieving internal and external validation AUCs of 0.85-0.90 and 0.73-0.85, respectively. The simplified model incorporating five key variables demonstrated internal and external validation AUCs of 0.71-0.86 and 0.75-0.78, respectively. Both models showed robust calibration and predictive stability across datasets.

conclusionBoth kinds of models were built based on machine learning tools, and proved to have certain prediction performance and extrapolation.

Indexed as

Acute aortic syndromeAlgorithmsEmergency departmentMachine learningMortalityPredictive model

Identifiers

PMID41624614
PMCPMC12856083

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.