Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624810›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026

The needs and expectations of people eligible for lung cancer screening in Switzerland: A mixed method study.

Mélinée Schindler, Cynthia Schneider, Christophe von Garnier, Cédric Bongard, Jean-Luc Bulliard, Chiara Pozzessere, Kevin Selby, Christina Akre

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mélinée SchindlerUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cynthia SchneiderUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Outpatient Clinics, Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christophe von GarnierDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cédric BongardDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Luc BulliardUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chiara PozzessereDepartment of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kevin SelbyUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Outpatient Clinics, Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christina AkreUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Organized lung cancer screening is being considered in Switzerland. This study assesses knowledge, barriers, and expectations regarding screening among the population and healthcare professionals prior to a pilot project. Methods: A convergent, mixed method approach combined an online survey, focus groups and interviews with laypeople aged 50-79 years with a smoking history and healthcare professionals. Data were collected between June and August 2023 in the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland. Results: Among 952 survey respondents (79% women, 60% current or ex-smokers), 19% were aware of lung cancer screening, but 75% would participate if offered.Responders preferred information from general practitioners (72%) or official letters (46%). In qualitative interviews, the 24 participants emphasized clear, non-stigmatizing, emotionally engaging communication, accessible logistics, and supportive professional guidance. Eligibility criteria were often viewed as too restrictive. Conclusions: The implementation of lung cancer screening in Switzerland will require a multichannel communication campaign, training and tools for healthcare professionals, and clear eligibility criteria using a pedagogical approach.

Indexed as

ImplementationLung cancerRisk communicationScreeningSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID41624810
PMCPMC12854060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.