Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625252›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2026

Improved quantification in end-to-end deep learning FastPET reconstruction using multi-view histo-images of attenuation correction factors.

Maël Millardet, Deepak Bharkhada, Juhi Raj, Josh Schaefferkoetter, Vladimir Panin, Maurizio Conti, Samuel Matej

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maël MillardetDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Deepak BharkhadaSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee, United States.
Juhi RajDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Josh SchaefferkoetterSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee, United States.
Vladimir PaninSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee, United States.
Maurizio ContiSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee, United States.
Samuel MatejDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

Deep Learning Reconstruction for Improved TOF PET Using Histo-Image PartitioningR01EB031806 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MATEJ, SAMUEL · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-to-end deep learning PET reconstruction significantly surpasses traditional iterative methods in speed and shows promise for surpassing them in specific scenarios, such as low-dose imaging. In 2019, a significant advancement was made by using histo-images instead of TOF sinograms as the network's input. Histo-images, by leveraging the image's geometry, are more compatible with convolutional neural networks than TOF sinograms. Typically, the network's input comprises a PET data histo-image patch and an attenuation map patch. However, this method has shown inconsistent bias in the reconstructed images. This work demonstrates that bias present in the prior method can be mitigated with alternative representations of attenuation information. Instead of using the attenuation map directly, we propose using a multi-view histo-image of the attenuation correction factors, inspired by the iterative DIRECT framework and standard statistical modeling practices. We tested using them as separate channels, as well as using them to pre-correct the data, or both. This histo-image encompasses the attenuation properties of each voxel from all directions within the entire lines of response. Our approaches significantly enhances image quantification, reducing the relative difference from MLEM to an average of 2.0 % to 3.0 % across 16 regions of interest, compared to 9.1 % with the previous method. Our statistical hypothesis test showed that the proposed methods significantly reduced absolute bias compared to the previous method, with p-values ranging from 0.002 to 0.007.

Indexed as

Clinical imaging systemsData correction techniquesDeep learningEnd-to-end learning in medical imagingNeural networkNuclear imaging (PET)Performance assessmentQuantification and estimationQuantitative imaging techniquesTomographic image reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID41625252
PMCPMC12857914

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.