Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625266›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026

The prevalence of cannabis use pre-versus post-cannabis legalization in Canada by mental health status: findings from national repeat cross-sectional surveys.

Samantha Rundle, Maryam Iraniparast, David Hammond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samantha RundleSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1.
Maryam IraniparastSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1.
David HammondSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 3G1.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The bidirectional relationship between cannabis use and mental health is complex. With the liberalization of cannabis laws in many countries, it is increasingly important to understand the impacts of cannabis legalization on individuals with mental health conditions. This study aimed to examine changes in cannabis use by mental health status pre-versus 5-years post-legalization of recreational cannabis in Canada. Methods: Data were from the International Cannabis Policy Study's national repeat cross-sectional surveys, conducted annually in Canada between 2018 and 2023, one year before and five years after the legalization of cannabis. The current analysis includes 92,843 Canadians aged 16-65 years. Adjusted logistic regression models examined changes in daily and past 12-month cannabis use pre-versus post-legalization among individuals experiencing each of the five mental health problems in the last year: anxiety, bipolar, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and schizophrenia. Findings: Past 12-month cannabis consumption increased from pre-legalization versus the year immediately following legalization (2019) among those with anxiety (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.53, Interpretation: Few changes in cannabis use were observed pre-versus post-cannabis legalization among Canadians who reported experiencing a mental health problem, whereas daily and past 12-month use increased among Canadians not reporting a mental health problem. Funding: Funding for the ICPS study was provided by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant and Project Bridge Grant (PJT-153342).

Indexed as

AnxietyCannabisDepressionMental health problemPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID41625266
PMCPMC12856411

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.