ArticleInfectious medicine2026
The diagnostic value of Xpert detection combined with nanopore sequencing for tuberculosis in HIV/AIDS patients.
Article in Infectious medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major cause of death in HIV/AIDS patients, where diagnosis is complicated by atypical presentation and paucibacillary disease. Current diagnostic methods have limitations in speed or sensitivity. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of rapid, portable nanopore sequencing for TB in this high-risk population. Methods: Clinical data and diagnostic results were collected from 59 HIV/AIDS patients with suspected tuberculosis. The diagnostic performance of nanopore sequencing was compared with AFB staining, TB-DNA testing, Xpert, and solid mycobacterial culture, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), Kappa coefficient, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additionally, this study further evaluated the diagnostic performance of nanopore sequencing in combination with AFB staining, TB-DNA testing, Xpert, and culture methods. Results: Nanopore sequencing showed the highest performance among all methods, with a sensitivity of 60.50%, specificity of 90.50%, PPV of 92.00%, NPV of 55.90%, and AUC of 0.76. When used in combination with other methods, nanopore sequencing and Xpert achieved the best diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 71.10%, specificity of 85.70%, PPV of 90.00%, NPV of 62.10%, Kappa value of 0.523, and an AUC of 0.78. Conclusions: The combination of nanopore sequencing and Xpert demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance for diagnosing TB in HIV/AIDS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.