ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2026
Patients' experiences of obstetric and gynaecological care in Québec: interactions with healthcare providers, respect of rights, satisfaction, and trust in the healthcare system.
Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent obstetrical and gynaecological care experiences and their sociodemographic and mental health correlates: A latent class analysis.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Obstetric and gynaecological care profoundly affects individuals' health and well-being. However, many international studies reveal negative and even dehumanizing experiences of this type of healthcare. This study documents recent experiences of obstetric and gynaecological care in Québec. We examine patient-healthcare provider interactions, respect for patient rights, whether patient needs are met, and how these factors impact satisfaction with the treatment provided and trust in the healthcare system. Methods: The PAROLES project is based on a self-report questionnaire posted online from July 2023 to January 2024. The sample comprises 1490 respondents who reported 1599 recent experiences of obstetric and gynaecological care. Descriptive analyses and linear regressions were performed. Results: Generally, patient-healthcare provider interactions were perceived positively, but some significant shortcomings were revealed in terms of unmet needs for shared decision-making and disrespected rights. Although patients were relatively satisfied with their care, there was considerable distrust in the healthcare system. Meeting needs in terms of shared decision-making and respecting rights were associated with overall satisfaction and trust in the healthcare system. Conclusion: The results uncover substantial inadequacies in obstetric and gynaecological care in Québec. To optimize patient-healthcare provider interactions and better meet patient needs, there must be greater respect for patients' rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.