ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Satisfaction level of dental graduates with the quality of clinical training in the undergraduate dental curriculum of Guilan Dental School.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDentistry is directly correlated with public health. Educational programming according to the correct principles of clinical training is a challenging task. Thus, clinical training quality assessment is of utmost importance. This study aimed to assess the satisfaction level of dental graduates with the quality of clinical training offered in the undergraduate dental curriculum of Guilan Dental School. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 192 dental graduates of Guilan Dental School from 2018 to 2023 with the same educational curriculum. An online questionnaire was used for data collection by sending its link to the graduates; of which, 158 (86 females, 72 males) were enrolled. Data were analyzed by the independent
resultsThe mean total satisfaction score with the received clinical training was 47.7 ± 16.9 (moderate). The respondents were the most satisfied with the restorative dentistry (63.8 ± 27.7), and the least satisfied with the orthodontics (20.3 ± 12.9) departments. The total satisfaction score was significantly associated with age (r = 0.198,
conclusionsEvaluating dental graduates' satisfaction level with the quality of clinical training can serve as an effective tool to identify the strengths and weaknesses of dental curricula and make the necessary reforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.