Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625770›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 randomized trials.

Chong Zhao, Minmin Zhu, Jinjin Jian, Jinfang Zeng

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chong Zhao *Department of Anesthesiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Minmin Zhu *Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangnan University Medical Center (Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital, Affiliated Wuxi Clinical College of Nantong University), Wuxi, China.
Jinjin Jian *Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
Jinfang ZengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Jiangnan University Medical Center (Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital, Affiliated Wuxi Clinical College of Nantong University), Wuxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a prevalent complication and remains a significant clinical challenge. The erector spinae plane (ESPB) block has been shown to offer significant pain relief during and after surgical procedures, positioning it as a potentially beneficial anesthetic technique. However, limited evidence currently supports its effectiveness in reducing nausea and vomiting specifically. This meta-analysis aims to examine the impact of ESPB on PONV rates, assessing whether the block offers measurable benefits for this common postoperative issue, in addition to its recognized analgesic effects. Methods: Two researchers conducted a comprehensive search across three databases-PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-using keywords such as "erector spinae plane block, meta-analysis, nausea, and vomiting" to identify all relevant literature. The data obtained from these studies were then analyzed through meta-analysis, utilizing Review Manager software to synthesize findings and assess overall outcomes. Results: In this meta-analysis, 44 trials involving 2,830 patients were analyzed. The ESPB was found to significantly decrease the incidence of nausea (risk difference (RD) = -0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.21-0.12) and vomiting (RD = -0.12, 95% CI: -0.17-0.07) compared to no ESPB. Additionally, ESPB decreased the dosage of morphine [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.86, 95% CI: -1.54 to -0.18], fentanyl (SMD = -2.96, 95% CI: -5.13 to -0.79), and tramadol (SMD = -1.43, 95% CI: -2.32 to -0.55) when compared to no ESPB. It also reduced VAS movement at 24 h (SMD = -1.58, 95% CI: -3.04 to -0.13) and lowered the occurrence of dizziness (RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.18-1.02), while prolonging the likelihood of itching (RR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.25-0.61). We assessed the outcomes of nausea and vomiting with GRADE, and they were high to moderately certain, respectively. In addition, our analysis of trial sequences found adequate sample sizes for reductions in the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis found that ESPB may be able to reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting and improve the quality of patients' postoperative recovery and trial sequential analysis confirmed an adequate sample size for this conclusion. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024604805.

Indexed as

erector spinae plane blockESPBmeta-analysisnauseavomiting

Identifiers

PMID41625770
PMCPMC12855405

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.