ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026
EACVI Survey on the Current Multi-Modality Imaging Practice in Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- International practices and variability in right heart echocardiography: results from the RVNet(Work) international survey.Echo research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) survey evaluated current practice patterns in the imaging assessment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), focusing on conventional and advanced modalities, the adoption of recent classifications, and barriers to quantitative right heart assessment. Methods and results: A 25-item online questionnaire was launched during EuroEcho Imaging 2024 and distributed via EACVI channels. From 10 December 2024 to 3 July 2025, 530 respondents from 69 countries participated. Most worked in tertiary/university hospitals (62%) and were imaging specialists (41%) or clinical cardiologists (40%). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was almost universally applied (96%), while use of transoesophageal (TOE) and 3D echocardiography was variable. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and fractional area change (RVFAC) were frequently used, but RV strain and ejection fraction were underutilized due to time constraints and software unavailability. TR quantification relied mainly on colour Doppler-based parameters, with advanced approaches-3D colour Doppler, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-reserved for selected patients. Half of the respondents routinely applied the 5-grade TR severity scheme, and leaflet-based anatomical classification was inconsistently adopted. Cardiac computed tomography, CMR, and invasive haemodynamics were more often used in patients referred for transcatheter interventions. Conclusion: This EACVI survey highlights considerable heterogeneity in TR imaging practice, with increasing yet slow adoption of robust quantitative and advanced modalities for assessing TR severity and right heart morphology/function. These findings underscore the need for improved access to advanced imaging technologies and broader dissemination of contemporary standards to enhance the quality and consistency of TR imaging in clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.