ReviewEuropean journal of midwifery2026
The role of oxidative stress and antioxidant approaches in preeclampsia: A narrative review.
Review in European journal of midwifery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia (PE) is a potentially life-threatening pregnancy complication characterized by new-onset hypertension and proteinuria. Although multiple risk factors have been associated with its development, the underlying etiology remains incompletely understood. Among the mechanisms most strongly linked to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, oxidative stress (OS) has emerged as a central contributor. Excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) contributes to DNA damage, apoptosis, endothelial dysfunction, increased release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and impaired anti-inflammatory responses. This narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding the role of OS in the pathophysiology of PE and explores the potential impact of antioxidant-based strategies for its prevention and management. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, published in English, up to December 2025. Priority was given to clinical studies involving women with PE, particularly those evaluating antioxidant supplementation or related therapeutic interventions. Although it remains unclear whether OS represents a primary cause or secondary consequence of PE, accumulating evidence suggests that reduced antioxidant capacity and increased OS markers contribute to disease development and progression. Studies evaluating antioxidant-based interventions report biologically relevant effects; however, clinical outcomes remain heterogeneous. Overall, OS appears to play a key role in PE, highlighting the need for well-designed longitudinal and interventional studies to clarify causality and define the true therapeutic value of targeting redox pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.