ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2026
Y-Stent Placement as a Possibly Useful Bailout Technique for Coil Protrusion into Parent Artery in Coil Embolization: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Stent placement is sometimes used as a bailout strategy to preserve the parent vessel during coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms. However, in more challenging situations, a Y-stent configuration may be required, although its safety and efficacy remain uncertain, and no consensus has been established. This report describes a case in which Y-stent placement was used as a bailout strategy after coil deviation into the parent artery during endovascular treatment for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Case Presentation: A 41-year-old man presented to our hospital with the sudden onset of a severe headache. He was diagnosed with a subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by a ruptured wide-necked anterior communicating artery aneurysm and was transferred to our hospital for emergency coil embolization. During the procedure, the coil mass deviated from the parent artery, resulting in bilateral A2 occlusion. To restore blood flow, a bailout Y-stent technique was performed. Following antiplatelet loading, a Neuroform Atlas stent (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) was deployed from the right A2 to A1, and this was followed by a 2nd Neuroform Atlas stent from the left A2 to A1, forming a Y configuration. Subsequently, sedation management was administered. Three days later, additional coil embolization was performed to achieve complete aneurysm occlusion. The patient recovered without neurological deficits, and dual antiplatelet therapy was gradually tapered. Follow-up cerebral angiography at 2 years confirmed complete aneurysm occlusion. Conclusion: The Y-stent technique served as an effective bailout strategy for coil deviation in the wide-necked aneurysm, demonstrating favorable long-term outcomes. This case suggests that the Y-stent technique can provide a viable option for managing wide-necked aneurysms when coil deviation occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.