Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626289›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2026

Application of a virtual imaging framework for investigating a deep learning-based reconstruction method for 3D quantitative photoacoustic computed tomography.

Refik Mert Cam, Seonyeong Park, Umberto Villa, Mark A Anastasio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Refik Mert CamDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 61801, IL, USA.
Seonyeong ParkDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 61801, IL, USA.
Umberto VillaOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 78712, TX, USA.
Mark A AnastasioDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 61801, IL, USA.

Funding

The Center for Label-free Imagingand Multiscale Biophotonics (CLIMB)P41EB031772 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Stephen A Boppart · 2022 to 2026
$7.6M
A Computational Framework Enabling Virtual Imaging Trials of 3D Quantitative Optoacoustic Tomography Breast ImagingR01EB031585 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ANASTASIO, MARK A · 2022 to 2025
$2.3M
Advancing three-dimensional preclinical dynamic contrast-enhanced photoacoustic computed tomography via quantitative image reconstructionR01EB034261 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Umberto Villa · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
Deep learning technologies for estimating the optimal task performance of medical imaging systemsR01EB034249 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Mark A Anastasio · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB031772NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031585NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB034249NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB034261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative photoacoustic computed tomography (qPACT) is a promising imaging modality for estimating physiological parameters such as blood oxygen saturation. However, developing robust qPACT reconstruction methods remains challenging due to computational demands, modeling difficulties, and experimental uncertainties. Learning-based methods have been proposed to address these issues but remain largely unvalidated. Virtual imaging (VI) studies are essential for validating such methods early in development, before proceeding to less-controlled phantom or in vivo studies. Effective VI studies must employ ensembles of stochastically generated numerical phantoms that accurately reflect relevant anatomy and physiology. Yet, most prior VI studies for qPACT relied on overly simplified phantoms. In this work, a realistic VI testbed is employed for the first time to assess a representative 3D learning-based qPACT reconstruction method for breast imaging. The method is evaluated across subject variability and physical factors such as measurement noise and acoustic aberrations, offering insights into its strengths and limitations.

Indexed as

Breast imagingNumerical breast phantomsQuantitative photoacoustic computed tomographyVirtual imaging studies

Identifiers

PMID41626289
PMCPMC12858365

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.