ArticleACS omega2026
Molecular Dynamics and Experimental Validation of Natural Products from Chuanxiong Rhizoma as VEGFR2 Inhibitors for nAMD Therapy.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroprotective potential of Prunetin in streptozotocin-induced cognitive dysfunction: insights from computational and experimental studies.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Improving the yield and biological activity of sage essential oil using NADES: in vitro and in silico insights.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness among the elderly worldwide. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is a significant subtype of AMD, responsible for the blindness of over 90% of patients with AMD. The hallmark of nAMD is choroidal angiogenesis dysregulation, a condition that can result in severe inflammation, leakage, and bleeding, ultimately leading to a precipitous decline in visual acuity. Inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway has been proven to be an effective therapeutic strategy for this disease. Intraocular injection of anti-VEGF macromolecule drugs is a clinical therapy for this disease, but it has shortcomings, such as severe side effects, high cost, long treatment cycle, and complex administration methods. Consequently, the identification of novel small-molecule drugs and the development of innovative delivery mechanisms are of paramount importance for the treatment of this condition. Chuanxiong Rhizoma (CX), a type of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), has been employed in the treatment of vascular-related diseases. Contemporary pharmacological research has demonstrated that CX contains a substantial quantity of natural compounds that exhibit anti-VEGF activity. In this study, we employed molecular simulation docking and molecular dynamics (MD) to examine the anti-VEGFR2 effects of 10 natural compounds derived from CX. Sorafenib was selected as the reference ligand, which is a marketed VEGFR2 inhibitor for cancer treatment. As a DFG-out inhibitor, sorafenib stabilizes the inactive conformation of the kinase by binding to an allosteric site near the ATP-binding pocket. In our research, natural products exhibiting a strong binding affinity were identified using computer-simulated docking technology and detailed binding sites were predicted. The findings of the research indicate that apigenin exhibits the strongest affinity for the VEGFR2 receptor with the formation of three hydrogen bonds. The molecular docking results indicate that the CYS919 and ASP1046 amino acid residues of VEGFR2 are the primary groups that form hydrogen bonds with the ligands. Furthermore, the AutoQSAR module of Schrödinger Suite predicted apigenin to have the highest predicted pIC
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.