ArticleBMJ public health2026
Exploring factors affecting access to non-communicable disease medicines in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural Inequalities in Ambulatory Care: A Scoping Review of Access and Quality and the Neglected Dimension of Patient Safety.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This systematic review sought to identify factors affecting access to non-communicable disease (NCD) medicines across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and gaps for further inquiry. Design: This is a systematic review that follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data sources: We systematically searched for articles published in English up to 7 June 2024 in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligibility criteria: We included qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods articles that included data collected from at least one LMIC; referenced at least one of the four major NCDs (ie, cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and chronic respiratory disease); and described access to medicines. We excluded articles written in languages other than English and countries not categorised as LMICs. Data extraction and synthesis: Six reviewers completed data extraction and retrieved key findings on six dimensions of access: accessibility, acceptability, availability, price, affordability and quality. We analysed extracted data through narrative synthesis and compared key determinants across the articles. Quality assessment was completed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Results: Database searches resulted in 2339 articles, and 157 articles met inclusion criteria. Articles covered 118 countries, with most located in sub-Saharan Africa (n=33) and Latin America and the Caribbean (n=24). The most common NCDs were cardiovascular diseases (n=133), diabetes (n=98) and respiratory diseases (n=79). The majority of articles reported on availability (n=127) and affordability (n=103). The following key determinants affected most or all dimensions of access to NCD medicines: health facility type (private or public), medicine type (generic or originator) and quality, and patient socioeconomic status and geographic location. Conclusions: Challenges across all six dimensions of access significantly affect access to NCD medicines. These challenges were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Access recommendations include (1) improved evidence-based forecasting to reduce stockouts through investments in data infrastructure, innovative LMIC-specific forecasting tools and pooled procurement; (2) increased use of quality-assured generic medicines through international non-proprietary name prescribing, regulation of originator brand promotion and generic substitution; (3) improved quality of NCD medicines through stringent regulatory requirements and national and supranational pharmacovigilance systems; and (4) expansion of NCD medicine financing through universal health coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.