ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Glutathione responsive nanomedicine leverages tumor redox imbalance for targeted cancer theranostics.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- GSH-Related Enzymes GPx4, Chac1, and GSTs and Redox Regulation of Ferroptosis in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Evolving Landscape of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy: From Conventional Modalities to TME-Responsive Prodrug Design Strategies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The glutathione (GSH) redox system plays a central role in maintaining cellular homeostasis, but its dysregulation in cancer contributes to tumor progression, therapy resistance, and metabolic adaptation. Elevated intracellular GSH levels represent both a barrier to conventional therapies and an opportunity to design redox-responsive drug delivery systems. In recent years, GSH has emerged as a promising therapeutic trigger and biomarker, driving the development of nanotechnology-enabled platforms for controlled drug release, imaging, and theranostics. This review provides a critical and translational analysis of GSH-responsive nanomedicine, highlighting chemical strategies such as disulfide/diselenide linkages, transition metal systems, and GSH-activated prodrugs. Unlike prior reviews, which often present descriptive overviews, this article emphasizes comparative evaluation of design principles, biological mechanisms, and translational hurdles, including biosafety, tumor heterogeneity, and large-scale manufacturability. We further outline future perspectives such as hybrid multifunctional nanoplatforms, patient-specific redox profiling, and clinical pathways for regulatory approval. By integrating insights from redox biology and nanotechnology, this review offers a timely and original perspective on the opportunities and challenges of exploiting tumor redox imbalance for precision drug delivery and cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.