ArticlePloS one2026
Differences in drug intake levels (high versus low takers) do not necessarily imply distinct drug user types: Insights from a new cluster-based model.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences between males and females in psychostimulant/sucrose self-administration (when observed) may not necessarily be driven by biological sex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The recreational-to-habitual shift in psychostimulant use is an economic demand parameter that is unrelated to drug consumption levels (under normal and punishment conditions).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA current model categorizes drug takers into high versus low takers (HT and LT) based on their drug intake levels, with the assumption that these groups represent different phenotypes. When several drug doses are considered, the inverted u-shaped dose-response curves (IUDR) of HT are shifted upwards and rightward, relative to that of LT. However, these IUDR 'shifts' are not quantitative metrics and may be subjective. Also, differences in intake levels do not necessarily imply distinctions in other variables (such as demand elasticity) that are important for drug user phenotypology. With supporting evidence from a recent report, we hypothesized that, contrary to assumptions in the field, HT and LT do not necessarily represent distinct phenotypes.
methodsMale Sprague Dawley rats (n = 12) self-administered different doses of cocaine, and we obtained IUDR and demand curves per individual. We developed a new model to quantify the variables that defined the structure of the IUDR and we employed behavioral economic principles to obtain variables that defined the demand curve. We conducted principal component analysis/gaussian mixtures model clustering of variables from both IUDR and demand curves, to identify/compare the clusters that were revealed to HT/LT groups that were distinguished via median split.
resultsThe cluster-based model identified groups more distinct than LT versus HT. LT and HT were composed of mixtures of individuals from these distinct clusters. LT/HT were not very different when several other variables were considered.
conclusionsDifferences in drug intake levels (HT versus LT) do not necessarily imply distinct phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.