ArticlePloS one2026
Structural damage detection and safety assessment method based on machine vision and machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural damage detection and health assessment are crucial for maintaining infrastructure safety and durability. This study presents a novel multi-scale vision-based framework that combines deep learning and machine learning for accurate and interpretable structural safety evaluation. Specifically, we integrate ResNet-50 and SegFormer models to jointly achieve coarse-level damage classification and fine-grained pixel-level segmentation. Seven key damage parameters are quantitatively extracted from high-resolution images-such as crack length, spalling area, and rebar exposure-and serve as interpretable features for safety assessment. A Random Forest (RF) model is developed to establish a nonlinear mapping from these visual features to structural safety levels. Experimental results demonstrate that the RF-based safety assessment model outperforms other traditional machine learning approaches, achieving an accuracy of 87.0%, F1-score of 0.76, and AUC of 0.83, highlighting its strong generalization and classification capabilities. This work offers a comprehensive and generalizable solution for automated structural damage detection and safety evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.