ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Development and Validation of the Kazakhstan Version of the Questionnaire Based on the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Model for Assessment of Telemedicine Models for Evaluating the Usability and Effectiveness of Telemedicine Services Among Physicians: Multiphase Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Kazakhstan has lacked validated tools to comprehensively assess physicians' perceptions, usability, and perceived effectiveness of telemedicine services. International frameworks such as the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) and the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST) have not previously been adapted to the national clinical and organizational context. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate TUQ-MAST-KZ, a Kazakhstan-adapted questionnaire integrating components of the TUQ and MAST models to assess physicians' perceptions, usability, and effectiveness of telemedicine services. Methods: A multiphase study was conducted, including literature review, questionnaire development, linguistic and cultural adaptation, expert content validity assessment, and pilot testing. An online survey (Google Forms) was administered to 156 physicians representing different regions and levels of health care delivery in Kazakhstan. Internal consistency (Cronbach α) and content validity indices were calculated. Additional evaluations covered clarity, structure, and practical applicability. Results: The final TUQ-MAST-KZ instrument contains 27 items capturing technological, clinical, organizational, and behavioral dimensions of telemedicine use. The scale demonstrated high content validity (scale-level content validity index=0.94). Internal consistency was excellent, with an overall Cronbach α of 0.924. Respondents reported that the questionnaire was clearly structured, easy to complete, and relevant to clinical practice. Organizational items identified key barriers to telemedicine adoption, including limited infrastructure, insufficient managerial support, and the need for additional training. Conclusions: TUQ-MAST-KZ is a valid, reliable, and practice-oriented instrument for assessing physicians' perceptions of telemedicine services in Kazakhstan. It can support digital health monitoring, implementation analysis, educational planning, and policy development. Future studies should evaluate its applicability across broader samples and diverse clinical specialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.