ArticleBehavioural brain research2026
Second-order conditioning of safety in male and female rats.
Article in Behavioural brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stimuli can acquire meaning and significance indirectly by being paired with other stimuli that already have known outcomes. When a stimulus has a well-established association with either aversive or rewarding consequences, other neutral stimuli can take on similar properties simply by occurring alongside it - even if the original outcome is not presented. This process is known as second-order conditioning. Relatively few studies have examined second-order conditioning of inhibitory safety memories. Here, we examined second-order conditioning of safety in adult male and female Long-Evans rats by adapting our well-established first-order safety conditioning paradigm to include novel stimuli paired with the established safety cue. Our findings demonstrate that a second-order safety cue can attenuate fear responses to a degree comparable to that of a first-order safety cue. In contrast, a novel cue that had never been paired with a safety signal failed to produce an equivalent reduction in defensive behavior during fear cue presentation, demonstrating that the reduced fear to the second-order safety cue was a product of conditioning and not external inhibition. Developing methods to generalize safety to novel stimuli that have not been explicitly conditioned for safety holds significant promise for advancing innovative strategies aimed at mitigating maladaptive fear responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.