ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparison of Oxford versus Japanese Histological Grading to predict renal function decline in IgA nephropathy: a Japanese prospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Oxford (split) and Japanese Histological Grade (JHG [lumped]) classifications of immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) are widely used in Japan. We compared their prognostic ability and explored the benefits of combining them. Data were from a prospective IgAN cohort (2005–2015). The primary endpoint was a ≥ 50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or end-stage renal disease. Cox regression with Uno C assessed prognostic discrimination. The integrated discrimination improvement index evaluated the added value of histologic to clinical variables (eGFR, urinary protein, and mean arterial pressure) at 1, 5, and 10 years. Kaplan–Meier analysis stratified patients into JHG 1 and 2–4 to assess the prognostic value of mesangial hypercellularity (M) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (T). Among 938 patients (median follow-up: 66 months), 58 (6.2%) reached the endpoint. M and T (Oxford) and JHG were significantly associated with outcomes. Both systems showed good discrimination (Uno C: 0.83 and 0.86). Adding Oxford to clinical variables improved prediction at 5 and 10 years; adding JHG improved prediction at 1, 5, and 10 years. M and T were predictive in JHG 2–4 but not in JHG 1. Both classifications demonstrated comparable discrimination. Their combined use can help enhance predictive precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.