Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41629539›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2026

Infants have rich visual categories in ventrotemporal cortex at 2 months of age.

Cliona O'Doherty, Áine T Dineen, Anna Truzzi, Graham King, Lorijn Zaadnoordijk, Keelin Harrison, Enna-Louise D'Arcy, Jessica White, Chiara Caldinelli, Tamrin Holloway and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The cortical scene processing network emerges in infancy, prior to independent navigation experience.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Cliona O'DohertyTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. clionaod@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-1199
Áine T DineenTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4218-5192
Anna TruzziTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2328-868X
Graham KingTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2894-9360
Lorijn ZaadnoordijkTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Keelin HarrisonTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2349-4910
Enna-Louise D'ArcyTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jessica WhiteTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1886-8305
Chiara CaldinelliTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Tamrin HollowayTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Anna KravchenkoTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jörn DiedrichsenDepartments of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences and Computer Science, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0264-8532
Ailbhe TarrantThe Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Angela T ByrneChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
Adrienne ForanThe Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Eleanor J MolloyChildren's Health Ireland (CHI), Dublin, Ireland.
Rhodri CusackTrinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5234-7415

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) ERC-2017-ADG, FOUNDCOG, 787981EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) MSCA-IFIrish Research Council (An Chomhairle um Thaighde in Éirinn) GOIPG/2021/223Irish Research Council (An Chomhairle um Thaighde in Éirinn) GOIPG/2021/223 and GOIPG/2023/2479Irish Research Council (An Chomhairle um Thaighde in Éirinn) GOIPG/2023/2479Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) SFI RC-17/RCPhD/3482-RCPhD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What are the foundations of visual categories in the human brain? Although infant looking behavior characterizes the development of overt categorization, it cannot measure neural representation or distinguish the underlying mechanism. For this, we need rich neuroimaging from young infants and the capacity to apply advanced computational models of vision. In this study, we conducted an awake functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of more than 100 2-month-old infants, with follow-ups at 9 months, finding that categorical structure is present in high-level visual cortex from 2 months of age. This precedes its emergence in lateral visual cortex, suggesting non-hierarchical development of category representations. A deep neural network model aligned with infants' representational geometry, indicating that the features comprising infants' category template span a range of complexities and can be learned from the statistics of visual input. Our results reveal the existence of complex function in ventral visual cortex at 2 months of age and describe the early development of category perception.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentPattern Recognition, VisualVisual CortexVisual PerceptionBrain MappingFemaleHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41629539
PMCPMC12971487

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.