ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable multi-modal approach for uncovering key predictors of stroke-risk from ECG, EMG, blood pressure, and respiratory signals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrical bioimpedance spectral markers distinguish balance ability in older adults without provoking fall risk.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and timely stroke-risk prediction is necessary to help patients at risk take guided measures, as stroke remains a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide. While there are several developed stroke-risk prediction models using various bio-signals, it remains unclear which signal or signal feature carries the most information towards stroke. Additionally, respiratory signals have not been included in these models, despite research showing their relation to stroke disease. We address these gaps by developing an explainable multi-modal stroke-risk prediction model that integrates respiratory signals (carbon dioxide (CO[Formula: see text]), and respiration flow) alongside blood pressure (BP), electrocardiogram (ECG) and electromyography (EMG). We developed a single perceptron model which achieved a prediction accuracy of 84.91% on a dataset of 64 subjects, outperforming state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques, namely LIME, SHAP, and Anchors, were applied to interpret the model's decisions. The Model Explanation Metric Consensus (MEMC) XAI evaluation metric revealed SHAP as the most reliable explainer, which identified CO[Formula: see text]-derived features as critical predictors. The findings demonstrate the overlooked value of respiratory signals in stroke-risk prediction, as well as the importance of explainable multi-modal approaches in advancing stroke-risk prediction, and enabling clinicians to better understand and trust AI models for improved patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.